Understand the underlying structure of the determinants of overall job performance evaluation

Authors

  • saad ali alanezy
  • amer ali alatawy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71207/ijas.v8i31.3108

Keywords:

The underlying structure, Evaluation of job performance

Abstract

The present research aims to explore content nature of latent structure of antecedents of overall job performance ratings based upon previous researchers\\' notions and opinions in explaining comprehensive multi view for job performance dimensions. This view agrees that job performance for employee includes three main dimensions (task performance, citizenship performance and counterproductive work behavior). Conceptual and empirical purport for this research depend on three key directions. The first direction proceeds to knowing relationship nature among three performance dimensions and overall job performance ratings. The second direction aims to explore relative importance for these dimensions on overall job performance ratings. In the third direction, this research attempts to know interrelationships among these three dimensions. By using structural equation modeling, the research\\'s hypotheses were tested and some of meaningful recommendations were formulated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

- Befort, N. & Hattrup , K. (2003). Valuing Task and Contextual Performance:

Experience, Job Roles, and Ratings of the Importance of Job Behaviors ,

Applied H.R.M. Research, 2003, Volume 8, Number 1, pages 17-32.

- Bolon, D. S. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior among hospital

employees: A multidimensional analysis involving job satisfaction and

organizational commitment. Journal of Hospital & Health Services

Administration, 42(2): 221-241.

- Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain

to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt, & W. C.

Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San

Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

- Borman,W., 2004. The concept of organizational citizenship. Current

Directions in Psychological Science 13 (6), 238–241.

- Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS,

and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah,

NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

- Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in

industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough

(Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol.

, pp. 687–732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

- Campbell, J. P., Gasser, M. B., & Oswald, F. L.(1996). The substantive

nature of job performance variability. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual

differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 258-299). San Francisco:

Jossey-Bass Publishers.

- Cascio, W. (2006). Managing human resources: productivity, quality of work

life, profits. Seventh Edition, McGraw. Hall, International Edition.

- Chan, F., Lee, G., Lee, E., Kubota, C., & Allen, Ch., (2007). Structural

Equation Modeling in Rehabilitation Counseling Research, Rehabilitation

Counseling Bulletin, 51:1, 53-66.

- Christensen, R., & Whiting, S. (2009). The Role of Task Performance and

Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Performance Appraisals Across

Sectors: Exploring the Role of Public Service Motivation. International

Public Service Motivation Research Conference, June 7-9, 2009,

Bloomington, IN

- Coole, D. (2003). The Effects of Citizenship Performance, Task Performance,

and Rating Format on Performance Judgments. Unpublished thesis, College

of Arts and Sciences, University of South Florida.12- Costello, A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor

analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis.

Journal of Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, Vol. 10, No 7, 1-9.

- Fox, S. and Spector, P.E. (1999) A model of work frustration-aggression.

Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 915-931.

- Fox, S., Spector, P., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior

(CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some

mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of

Vocational Behavior, 59, 291–309.

- Giacalone, R. A., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Antisocial behavior in

organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

- Golob, T. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling for Travel Behavior

Research. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California,

Irvine; Irvine, CA 92697-3600, U.S.A.

- Griffin, R. W., O'Leary-Kelly, A., & Collins, J. (1998). Dysfunctional work

behaviors in organizations. Trends in Organizational Behavior, 5, 65–82.

- Gruys, M., & Sackett, P. (2003). Investigating the dimensionality of

counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Selection and

Assessment, 11, 30-42.

- Hewitt AK, Foxcroft DR, McDonald J. Multitrait-multimethod confirmatory

factor analysis of the Attributional Style Questionnaire. Pers Indiv Dic.

;37:1483-91

- Hollinger, R.C., & Clark, J.P. (1982) Formal and informal social controls of

employee deviance. The Sociology Quarterly, 23, 333-343.

- Johnson, E. C., & Meade, A. W. (2010, April). A Multi-Level Investigation of

Overall Job Performance Ratings. Paper presented at the 25th

Annual

Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology,

Atlanta, GA.

- Kahya, E. (2009). The effects of job performance on effectiveness.

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39, 96–104

- Lievens, F., Conway, J. M., & De Corte, W. (2008). The relative importance

of task, citizenship and counterproductive performance to job performance

ratings: Do rater source and team-based culture Matter? Journal of

Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 11-27.

- Lock , A. (2005). The relationship between individualistic/ collectivistic

orientation and organizational citizenship behavior and the possible

influence of leadership style. Unpublished thesis, Faculty of Social Sciences,

Erasmus University Rotterdam, Turkish.

- MacCallum, P. &Austin, J. (2000). Applications of structural equation

modeling in psychological research. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51:201–226

- Maccallum, R., & Austin.,J. (2000). Applications of structural equation

modeling in psychological research. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2000. 51:201–226

- MacKenzie, S.B., P.M. Podsakoff and R. Fetter ‘The impact of

organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of salesperson

performance’, Journal of Marketing (1993) 57: 70–80.

- Motowidlo, S. J., & Schmit, M. J. (1999). Performance assessment in unique

jobs. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of

performance (pp. 56-86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.29- Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., Schmidt, M. J. (1997). A theory of

individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human

Performance, 10, 71-83.

- Nunnaly, J.C. & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York:

McGraw-Hill.

- Ones, D. S. (2002). Introduction to the special issue on counterproductive

behaviors at work. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 1–

- Organ, D. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship

behavior, Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 43-72.

- Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. (2002). Narcissism and counterproductive

behavior: do bigger egos mean bigger problems? International Journal of

Selection and Assessment, 10(1), 126–134.

- Peterson, D. (2002). Deviant workplace behavior and the organization's

ethical climate. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 47-61.

- Raelin, J. A. (1994). Three scales of professional deviance within

organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 483-501.

- Rego , A. & Cunha , M. (2006) . Organizational Justice and Citizenship

Behaviors: a Study in a Feminine, High Power distance Culture , Submission

of Papers for Publication , University de Santiago. 3810-193 Aveiro.

Portugal.

- Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace

behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management

Journal, 38, 555–572.

- Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. (2002). The relative importance of task,

citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job

performance: a policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology,

, 66-80.

- Van Dyne, Cummings, L., & McLean J., (1995). Organizational citizenship

behavior: construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of

Management Journal, 37, 765-802.

- Vilela, B., González, J., & Ferrín, P. (2008). Person–organization fit, OCB

and performance appraisal: Evidence from matched supervisor–salesperson

data set in a Spanish context. Industrial Marketing Management 37, 1005–

- Yun, s., Takeuchi, R., & Liu, W. (2007). Employee Self-Enhancement

Motives and Job Performance Behaviors: Investigating the Moderating

Effects of Employee Role Ambiguity and Managerial Perceptions of

Employee Commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, No. 3, 745–

Published

2025-02-27

How to Cite

saad ali alanezy, & amer ali alatawy. (2025). Understand the underlying structure of the determinants of overall job performance evaluation. Iraqi Journal for Administrative Sciences, 8(31), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.71207/ijas.v8i31.3108