The role of differentiation in the relationship between the leader and the follower in enhancing the outcomes of the strategic decision
Analytical study of the opinions of a sample of Top management teams (Department managers) in the Ministry agency for Administrative and Financial Affairs in the Iraqi Ministry of Interior
Keywords:
differentiation in the relationship between the leader and the follower, the outcomes of the strategic decisionAbstract
This study aimed to test the effect of differentiation in the relationship between the leader and the follower, which is a one-dimensional variable on the outcomes of the strategic decision with its indicators (decision quality, decision understanding, commitment to the decision) through an intentional sample of Top management teams (Department managers) in the directorates of the Ministry agency for administrative and financial affairs in the Iraqi Ministry of Interior, using a set of statistical analyzes, including mean, standard deviation, correlation coefficient (Pearson) and simple regression through statistical programs (SPSS V. 25) and (Amos v.20). The data was collected from the field reality by relying on the main data collection tool (the questionnaire), as 226 questionnaires were distributed to 47 directorates and were examined through the analysis The confirmatory factor, and using the aggregation method, the data of the respondents were collected into groups, so that we have (47) team or working groups. Through the results of the statistical analysis of the responses of the research sample, it was found that the differentiation in the relationship between the leader and the follower (LMXD), which is based on personal and social relationships, negatively affects the outcomes of the strategic decision, and on the contrary, if the type of differentiation in the relationship between the leader and follower is based on performance, it may affect Positively on the outcomes of the strategic decision. and based on the conclusions that were reached, it was Presenting a set of recommendations, the importance of which is that leaders should enhance working relationships with members of top management teams who are characterized by high performance and avoid personal and social relationships at work. On the contrary, leaders should reduce relationships with members who are characterized by low performance and tend to form personal and social relationships, which negatively affects positively on the outcomes of strategic decisions.
References
العبيدي، رائد عبد الخالق عبدالله (1998). علاقة بعض المؤشرات التنبؤية بفاعلية القرارالاستراتيجي (دراسة ميدتنية على عينة من مدراء مستشفيات القطاع الخاص في محافظة بغداد)، اطروحة دكتوراه، كلية الادارة والاقتصاد، جامعة بغداد.
جلاب، احسان دهش & داخل، رحاب عبد الحسن (2010). دور تجنب مزالق التخطيط الاستراتيجي في تحقيق فاعلية القرارات الاستراتيجية (دراسة تحليأتية في الجامعات والكليات الاهلية)، كلية الادارة والاقتصاد - جامعة القادسية، مجلة الدراسات المستدامة، مجلد (3)، العدد (3).
المسعودي، فاطمة عبد علي & طالب، علاء فرحان (2010). المعرفة السوقية في تعزيز فاعلية القرارات الاستراتيجية (دراسة تطبيقية في الشركة العامة للإِسمنت الجنوبية). كلية الإدارة والاقتصاد - جامعة كربلاء، مجلة الإدارة والإقتصاد، مجلد (1)، العدد (1).
السامرائي، سلوى هاني (2012). عوامل النجاح الحرجة لنظام المعلومات الاستراتيجي وعلاقتها بفاعلية القرارات الاستراتيجية، كلية الادارة والاقتصاد - جامعة بغداد، مجلة العلوم الاقتصادية والإدارية، مجلد (18)، العدد (69).
الجبوري، مراد موسى عبد (2020). أثر خصائص جودة نظام المعلومات في فاعلية القرار الاستراتيجي (دراسة حالة في المعهد التقني الحويجة). المعهد التقني الحويجة - الجامعة التقنية الشمالية، مجلة جامعة كركوك للعلوم الإدارية والاقتصادية، مجلد (10) العدد (2).
المصادر الاجنبية
Abuzaid, A. N., Al-Ma’aitah, N., Al-Haraisa,Y. E., & Al-Tarawneh, K. I.(2019). Examining the Impact of Transformational Leadership on the Strategic Decisions Effectiveness of Jordanian Microfinance Companies. International Review of Management and Marketing, 9 (2).
Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of management journal, 39 (1), 123-148.
Amason, A. C., & Schweiger, D. M. (1994). Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making, and organizational performance. International journal of conflict management, 5 (3).
Buengeler, C., Piccolo, R. F., & Locklear, L. R. (2021). LMX differentiation and group outcomes: A framework and review drawing on group diversity insights. Journal of Management, 47 (1), 260-287.
Carnevale, J. B., Huang, L., & Paterson, T. (2019). LMX-differentiation strengthens the prosocial consequences of leader humility: an identification and social exchange perspective. Journal of Business Research, 96, 287-296.
Chen, X. P., He, W., & Weng, L. C. (2015). What is wrong with treating followers differently? The basis of leader-member exchange differentiation matters. Journal of Management, 44(3).
Chen, Y., Yu, E., & Son, J. (2013). Beyond leader-member exchange (LMX) differentiation: An indigenous approach to leader-member relationship differentiation. The Leadership Quarterly, 25 (3), 611-627.
Costello, A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Journal of Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, Vol. 10, No 7, 1-9.
Dansereau Jr, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational behavior and human performance, 13 (1), 46-78.
De Vellis, F. Robert (2003). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Second Edition, SAGE Publications.
Dong, Y., Jiang, J., Rong, Y., & Yang, B. (2020). LMX differentiation and voice behavior: A resource-conservation framework. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27 (3).
Dooley, R. S., & Fryxell, G. E. (1999). Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent: The moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (4), 389-402.
Doosje, B., Haslam, S. A., Spears, R., Oakes, P. J., & Koomen, W. (1998). The effect of comparative context on central tendency and variability judgments and the evaluation of group characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28 (2), 173-184.
Dulebohn, J. H., Wu, D., & Liao, C. (2017). Does liking explain variance above and beyond LMX? A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 149-166.
Engle, M. (2011). The strategic decision-making process of the board and its impact on decision outcomes. Cleveland, Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University.
Epitropaki, O., Kapoutsis, I., Ellen III, B. P., Ferris, G. R., Drivas, K., & Ntotsi, A. (2016). Navigating uneven terrain: The roles of political skill and LMX differentiation in prediction of work relationship quality and work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37 (7).
Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2010). Differentiated leader–member exchanges: The buffering role of justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (6), 1104.
Ge, Y. H., & Yang, W. Z. (2011). A review on the top management team reflexivity influencing strategic decision outcomes. African Journal of Business Management, 5 (35), 13442-13448.
George, B., Desmidt, S., & De Moyer, J. (2016). Strategic decision quality in Flemish municipalities. Public Money & Management, 36 (5), 317-324.
Gottfredson, R. K., Wright, S. L., & Heaphy, E. D. (2020). A critique of the leader-member exchange constructs: Back to square one. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(6), 101385.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The leadership quarterly, 6 (2), 219-247.
Guo, Y., Chen, L., Song, L. J., & Zheng, X. (2021). How LMX Differentiation Attenuates the Influence of Ethical Leadership on Workplace Deviance: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment. Frontiers in psychology, 12.
Han, J. H., Liao, H., Han, J., & Li, A. N. (2021). When leader–member exchange differentiation improves work group functioning: The combined roles of differentiation bases and reward interdependence. Personnel Psychology, 74 (1).
Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. The leadership quarterly, 20 (4), 517-534.
Herdman, A. O., Yang, J., & Arthur, J. B. (2014). How does leader-member exchange disparity affect teamwork behavior and effectiveness in work groups? The moderating role of leader-leader exchange. Journal of Management, 43 (5), 1498-1523.
Hooper, D. T., & Martin, R. (2008). Beyond personal leader-member exchange (LMX) quality: The effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 19 (1)
Hsu, Y. T., & Huang, S. P. K. (2011). Top management team characteristics, decision-making style, and organizational performance. African Journal of Business Management, 5 (30).
Kangas, H. (2021). Spanning leader–subordinate relationships through negative interactions: An examination of leader–member exchange breaches. Leadership, 17(2), 173-190.
Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1), 60-84.
Le Blanc, P. M., & González-Romá, V. (2012). A team-level investigation of the relationship between Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) differentiation, and commitment and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 23 (3), 534-544.
LEE, S. H., & Hwang, H. J. (2021). Abusive Supervision and Coworkers' Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Moderating Role of Perceived LMX Differentiation. East Asian Journal of Business Economics (EAJBE), 9 (2), 11-19.
Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24 (1), 43-72
Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader‐member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(6), 723-746.
Martin, R., Thomas, G., Legood, A., & Dello Russo, S. (2017). Leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation and work outcomes: Conceptual clarification and critical review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39 (2), 151-168.
Mustakallio, M., Autio, E., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). Relational and contractual governance in family firms: Effects on strategic decision making. Family business review, 15(3), 205-222.
Naidoo, L. J., Scherbaum, C. A., Goldstein, H. W., & Graen, G. B. (2011). A longitudinal examination of the effects of LMX, ability, and differentiation on team performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(3), 347-357.
Olson, B. J., Bao, Y., & Parayitam, S. (2007b). Strategic decision making within Chinese firms: The effects of cognitive diversity and trust on decision outcomes. Journal of World Business, 42(1), 35-46.
Olson, B. J., Parayitam, S., & Bao, Y. (2007). Strategic decision making: The effects of cognitive diversity, conflict, and trust on decision outcomes. Journal of management, 33(2).
Parayitam, S., & Dooley, R. S. (2007). The relationship between conflict and decision outcomes: Moderating effects of cognitive‐and affect‐based trust in strategic decision‐making teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18 (1), 42-73.
Shepherd, N. (2014). "An empirical examination of the strategic decision-making process the relationship between context, process, and outcomes". Thesis Introduction to get a Doctor of Philosophy at Aston University.
Simons, T. (1996). Executive conflict management: Keys to excellent decisions and smooth implementation. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 37 (6), 34-41.
Wooldridge, B., & Floyd, S. W. (1990). The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance. Strategic management journal, 11 (3), 231-241.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 ثامر حمـزة طالب الطائي، الهام ناظــم الشيباني
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their papers without restrictions.
